12 Bridge Street Epping Pty Ltd atf 12 Bridge Street Epping Unit Trust v D.R. Design (NSW) Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 866
The Adjudicator acted within power under s 21 of the Act to request submissions and set deadlines, and afforded procedural fairness by acting upon the parties' submissions. The failure of the Developer to provide an adjudication response within time was its own responsibility, and there is no basis to impugn the adjudicator's determination.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Summons / Judgment Principal Judgment, Ex Tempore
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['adjudication' 'security of Payment' 'procedural Fairness' 'statutory Construction']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Summons / Judgment Principal Judgment, Ex Tempore
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether adjudicator had power under s 21 of the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) to request submissions regarding service of adjudication application' 'Whether responses provided amounted to an adjudication response' 'Whether procedural fairness or natural justice was denied']
Ratio Decidendi
The Adjudicator acted within power under s 21 of the Act to request submissions and set deadlines, and afforded procedural fairness by acting upon the parties' submissions. The failure of the Developer to provide an adjudication response within time was its own responsibility, and there is no basis to impugn the adjudicator's determination.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['The Summons is dismissed with costs.' 'Funds paid into Court by the plaintiff are to be paid out to the defendant forthwith.' 'These orders are to be taken out forthwith.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment