21 Million Pty Limited v Clarence Street Pty Limited [2003] NSWSC 1178
Leave to lodge the reformulated caveat was refused due to ambiguity in the claimed interest, lack of written evidence of an equitable interest in favour of 21 Million, and no viable case established. Cost orders were made against Mr Taylor for acting without authority in proceedings and lodging the caveat, following applicable statutory provisions and precedents, to prevent depletion of FBN assets by unauthorized conduct.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Interlocutory Motions; Determination of Costs and Amendment Orders
- Legal Topics
- ['caveats' 'costs' 'authority to Commence Proceedings' 'equitable Interests' 'trusts']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Interlocutory Motions; Determination of Costs and Amendment Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted under section 74O Real Property Act to lodge a reformulated caveat' 'Whether orders for costs should be made against non-parties acting without authority' 'Nature of equitable interest and authority to commence proceedings']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to lodge the reformulated caveat was refused due to ambiguity in the claimed interest, lack of written evidence of an equitable interest in favour of 21 Million, and no viable case established. Cost orders were made against Mr Taylor for acting without authority in proceedings and lodging the caveat, following applicable statutory provisions and precedents, to prevent depletion of FBN assets by unauthorized conduct.
Court Disposition
Orders
- []
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment