Application by 24/7 Customer, Inc (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 1708

Application by 24/7 Customer, Inc (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 1708

As no formal opposition or application was made by Ms Parkin or her former employer to set aside the earlier or sought orders, and the orders complement those already properly made, it is just to make the further orders as proposed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 December 2017
Procedural Posture
Application / Further Orders Following Earlier Ex Parte Application and Orders
Outcome
Orders sought made
Legal Topics
['evidence on Commission' 'subpoena' 'ex Parte Application' 'short Service']
['evidence' 'civil Procedure'] ['evidence on Commission' 'subpoena' 'ex Parte Application' 'short Service']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application / Further Orders Following Earlier Ex Parte Application and Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether further orders should be made to facilitate examination and subpoena of Ms Parkin under Evidence on Commission Act 1995 (NSW)']

Ratio Decidendi

As no formal opposition or application was made by Ms Parkin or her former employer to set aside the earlier or sought orders, and the orders complement those already properly made, it is just to make the further orders as proposed.

Court Disposition

Orders sought made

Orders

  • ['Mr Justin Gleeson SC appointed to conduct examination of Ms Parkin as per US request.' 'Leave granted to plaintiff to issue subpoena to Ms Parkin in terms of MFI 2.' 'Order for short service granted.']