357 Thornleigh Place Pty Limited v Shams (No 2) [2023] NSWCATAP 229
Because the appellant was successful on the main grounds of appeal, but unsuccessful on two distinct issues (remitter for redetermination and the claim concerning termination of lease for non-provision of guarantee), the respondent should pay 90% of the appellant's costs rather than the full amount.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 August 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Costs Determination After Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- Applications concerning costs determined; the respondent ordered to pay 90% of the appellant's costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'appeal' 'unconscionable Conduct' 'lease Dispute']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Costs Determination After Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a hearing in respect of costs applications should be dispensed with' 'Whether costs should be awarded following the appeal' 'If so, what percentage of costs should be awarded given partial success']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the appellant was successful on the main grounds of appeal, but unsuccessful on two distinct issues (remitter for redetermination and the claim concerning termination of lease for non-provision of guarantee), the respondent should pay 90% of the appellant's costs rather than the full amount.
Court Disposition
Applications concerning costs determined; the respondent ordered to pay 90% of the appellant's costs.
Orders
- ['A hearing in respect of the applications concerning the costs of the appeal is dispensed with.' "The respondent is to pay 90% of the appellant's costs of the appeal, as agreed or assessed, on the ordinary basis."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment