3JM Pty Ltd v Turnbull [2012] NSWDC 1

3JM Pty Ltd v Turnbull [2012] NSWDC 1

Clause 31 of the lease was ambiguous and, construed in context, deferred the lessee's obligation to pay rent until completion of the contemplated capital works. The plaintiff failed to establish any relevant breach of clauses 4.1, 7.8, 8.1.1 or 10.2.2 of the lease and acted precipitately in terminating the lease and re-entering the premises. Because no relevant breach was established, the second defendant's guarantee was not enlivened and the plaintiff was not entitled to damages against him.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 January 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Claim by Lessor Against Guarantor of Lease for Damages / Principal Judgment After Hearing
Outcome
Verdict and judgment for the second defendant; plaintiff's claim against the guarantor dismissed in substance.
Legal Topics
['construction of Lease' 'ambiguity' 'breach of Lease' 'commercial Premises' 'guarantor Liability' 'causation' 'mitigation of Loss' 'unpaid Rent and Outgoings' 'land Clearing Costs']
['contract Law' 'leases' 'guarantees' 'damages'] ['construction of Lease' 'ambiguity' 'breach of Lease' 'commercial Premises' 'guarantor Liability' 'causation' 'mitigation of Loss' 'unpaid Rent and Outgoings' 'land Clearing Costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil Claim by Lessor Against Guarantor of Lease for Damages / Principal Judgment After Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether there was a relevant ambiguity in the provisions of the lease and, if so, how the lease should be construed.' 'Whether there were relevant breaches of the lease justifying termination and re-entry by the plaintiff on 23 November 2009, and the legal consequences if not.' "Whether the second defendant's guarantee of the first defendant's obligations under the lease applied to the plaintiff's claim." "The amount, if any, of the plaintiff's entitlement to damages against the second defendant pursuant to the guarantee."]

Ratio Decidendi

Clause 31 of the lease was ambiguous and, construed in context, deferred the lessee's obligation to pay rent until completion of the contemplated capital works. The plaintiff failed to establish any relevant breach of clauses 4.1, 7.8, 8.1.1 or 10.2.2 of the lease and acted precipitately in terminating the lease and re-entering the premises. Because no relevant breach was established, the second defendant's guarantee was not enlivened and the plaintiff was not entitled to damages against him.

Court Disposition

Verdict and judgment for the second defendant; plaintiff's claim against the guarantor dismissed in substance.

Orders

  • ['Verdict and judgment for the second defendant.' "The plaintiff must pay the second defendant's legal costs in defending the proceedings, those costs to be assessed on the ordinary basis, unless some other basis is established." 'The exhibits may be returned.' 'Liberty to apply on 7 days notice if further orders...