50 Burchmore Road Pty Ltd v Warringah Council [No 1] [2003] NSWLEC 394
The maximum housing density of one dwelling per 600 square metres does not apply to land equal to or greater than 3000 square metres. Accordingly, the present application is permissible as all owners have consented and the area is greater than 3000 square metres.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 December 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Development Approval / Determination of Preliminary Legal Issue
- Outcome
- Application ruled permissible; matter may proceed
- Legal Topics
- ['construction and Interpretation of Planning Instruments' 'housing Density Controls' 'exemptions to Local Environmental Plan']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Development Approval / Determination of Preliminary Legal Issue
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Interpretation of housing density exemption in Warringah Local Environmental Plan 2000' 'Whether development application permissible on land greater than 3000 square metres' 'Application of statutory interpretation principles to planning controls']
Ratio Decidendi
The maximum housing density of one dwelling per 600 square metres does not apply to land equal to or greater than 3000 square metres. Accordingly, the present application is permissible as all owners have consented and the area is greater than 3000 square metres.
Court Disposition
Application ruled permissible; matter may proceed
Orders
- ['The present application is permissible on the land covered by the application notwithstanding that it is in separate ownership as all owners have given their consent and the application is for an area of land greater than 3000 square metres.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment