88 Bay Street Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council [2019] NSWLEC 1369
The clause 4.6 variation request to exceed the maximum building height was upheld because compliance was found unreasonable due to the site's topography, environmental planning grounds justified the contravention, the objectives of the height standard and the R2 zone were satisfied, and the amended proposal did not result in significant adverse impacts on amenity, views, or privacy.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development application approved with conditions
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'height of Buildings Standard' 'environmental Planning Ground' 'development Control Plans']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the development application should be approved for demolition and construction at 4 and 6 Bayview Hill Road, Rose Bay' 'Whether a clause 4.6 variation to the maximum height standard under Woollahra Local Environmental Plan 2014 should be permitted']
Ratio Decidendi
The clause 4.6 variation request to exceed the maximum building height was upheld because compliance was found unreasonable due to the site's topography, environmental planning grounds justified the contravention, the objectives of the height standard and the R2 zone were satisfied, and the amended proposal did not result in significant adverse impacts on amenity, views, or privacy.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development application approved with conditions
Orders
- ['Applicant granted leave to rely on amended architectural plans and materials as referred to in condition A3 and the amended clause 4.6 request at Annexure B.' "Applicant's clause 4.6 written request for contravention of maximum height under Woollahra Local Environmental Plan 2014 is upheld." 'Appeal is upheld.'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment