8th Hole Developments Pty Ltd ATF The 8th Hole Developments Unit Trust v Northern Beaches Council [2025] NSWLEC 1059
The development consent is appropriate as the written requests for variation to the building height plane and floor space ratio standards under cl 4.6 of the Warringah Local Environmental Plan 2011 are justified, meeting all jurisdictional prerequisites and substantive requirements, and are compatible with planning objectives; the agreement between the parties addresses all relevant planning considerations and there are no legal impediments to granting consent subject to conditions.
- Parties
- Applicant: 8th Hole Developments Pty Ltd ATF The 8th Hole Developments Unit Trust; Respondent: Northern Beaches Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 February 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal / Conciliation Conference and Final Determination by Consent
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions; cost order for amendment payable by applicant.
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Seniors Housing, Building Standard Variation, Floor Space Ratio, Conciliation Conference
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
8th Hole Developments Pty Ltd ATF The 8th Hole Developments Unit Trust
Applicant
Northern Beaches Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal / Conciliation Conference and Final Determination by Consent
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether development consent should be granted for demolition and construction of seniors housing comprising 10 independent living units under DA2024/0565
- 2 Whether the proposed variation to the building height plane and floor space ratio standards under State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing) 2021 should be allowed
Ratio Decidendi
The development consent is appropriate as the written requests for variation to the building height plane and floor space ratio standards under cl 4.6 of the Warringah Local Environmental Plan 2011 are justified, meeting all jurisdictional prerequisites and substantive requirements, and are compatible with planning objectives; the agreement between the parties addresses all relevant planning considerations and there are no legal impediments to granting consent subject to conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions; cost order for amendment payable by applicant.
Orders
- The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs thrown away by the amendment of the Development Application, pursuant to s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, in the amount of $5000.
- The Applicant's written request pursuant to cl 4.6 of the Warringah Local Environmental Plan 2011, seeking a contravention of the building height plane development standard set out in s 84(2)(c)(ii) of State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing) 2021, is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment