T.J.M. Products Pty Ltd (trading as A.R.B. Vehicle Accessories) v A. & P. Tyres Pty Ltd (trading as Steel Tyre Co.) & Ors [1987] FCA 575
The entry and sealing of the order of 27 March 1987 by T.J.M.'s solicitors after service of a motion to vary or set aside that order was done to frustrate the jurisdiction of the Court and was an abuse of process. The Court's inherent power to prevent its process being used for a collateral advantage enabled it to set aside the entry and sealing of the order, notwithstanding procedural rules about finality of entered orders.
- Parties
- Applicant / Cross Respondent: T.J.M. Products Pty. Ltd. (trading as A.R.B. Vehicle Accessories); First Respondent: A. & P. Tyres Pty. Ltd. (trading as Steel Tyre Co); Second Respondent / Cross Claimant: Brigalow Park Pty. Ltd. (trading as A.R.B. Equipment S.A.; trading as A.R.B. Products); Third Respondent: Keith James Parkes; Fourth Respondent: Wilhelmina Maria Elizabeth Parkes; Fifth Respondent: Bruce Sampson; Sixth Respondent: Terence John Gavin; Seventh Respondent: Michael Gladwich; Cross Claimant: A.R.B. Engineering Pty. Ltd.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 October 1987
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion / Post Judgment Application / Judgment on Motion to Set Aside or Vary Previous Order as to Costs
- Outcome
- Order entered and sealed on 8 April 1987 set aside as abuse of process; motion as to costs to be heard further; costs of motion reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Abuse of Process, Setting Aside Orders, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
T.J.M. Products Pty. Ltd. (trading as A.R.B. Vehicle Accessories)
Applicant / Cross Respondent
A. & P. Tyres Pty. Ltd. (trading as Steel Tyre Co)
First Respondent
Brigalow Park Pty. Ltd. (trading as A.R.B. Equipment S.A.; trading as A.R.B. Products)
Second Respondent / Cross Claimant
Keith James Parkes
Third Respondent
Wilhelmina Maria Elizabeth Parkes
Fourth Respondent
Bruce Sampson
Fifth Respondent
Terence John Gavin
Sixth Respondent
Michael Gladwich
Seventh Respondent
A.R.B. Engineering Pty. Ltd.
Cross Claimant
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Post Judgment Application / Judgment on Motion to Set Aside or Vary Previous Order as to Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court has jurisdiction or power to set aside or vary an order as to costs after entry and sealing where a notice of motion was filed but the order was entered in the face of the motion
- 2 Whether the entry and sealing of the 27 March 1987 order amounted to an abuse of process
Ratio Decidendi
The entry and sealing of the order of 27 March 1987 by T.J.M.'s solicitors after service of a motion to vary or set aside that order was done to frustrate the jurisdiction of the Court and was an abuse of process. The Court's inherent power to prevent its process being used for a collateral advantage enabled it to set aside the entry and sealing of the order, notwithstanding procedural rules about finality of entered orders.
Court Disposition
Order entered and sealed on 8 April 1987 set aside as abuse of process; motion as to costs to be heard further; costs of motion reserved.
Orders
- The entry and sealing of the order made 27 March 1987 be struck out.
- The motion be set down for further submissions from counsel on the question of the costs of the proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment