Regina v Scowen [2007] NSWSC 792
The offender's culpability was confined to assisting Wade Stewart to avoid prompt apprehension after she knew he had stabbed and killed Brian Sawtell; she was not responsible for the killing itself. Her assistance lasted less than two days, principally by accompanying Stewart and through use of her mobile phone, and was objectively toward the lower end of seriousness for accessory after the fact to murder. Allowing for her early guilty plea, youth, rehabilitation and special circumstances, a sentence comprising a non-parole period effectively already served and a short balance term was appropriate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence for Accessory After the Fact to Murder / Sentence After Guilty Plea
- Outcome
- Sentence imposed; offender sentenced to imprisonment with release to parole directed on 23 July 2007.
- Legal Topics
- ['accessory After the Fact to Murder' 'victim Impact Statements' 'scope of Responsibility' 'assessment of Culpability' 'non Parole Period' 'special Circumstances']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence for Accessory After the Fact to Murder / Sentence After Guilty Plea
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether victim impact statements from members of the deceased's family could be received on sentence for the offender's offence of being an accessory after the fact to murder." "The scope of the offender's criminal responsibility for assisting Wade Stewart after the murder." "The objective seriousness and moral culpability of the offender's conduct." 'The appropriate sentence, including allowance for an early guilty plea and special circumstances.']
Ratio Decidendi
The offender's culpability was confined to assisting Wade Stewart to avoid prompt apprehension after she knew he had stabbed and killed Brian Sawtell; she was not responsible for the killing itself. Her assistance lasted less than two days, principally by accompanying Stewart and through use of her mobile phone, and was objectively toward the lower end of seriousness for accessory after the fact to murder. Allowing for her early guilty plea, youth, rehabilitation and special circumstances, a sentence comprising a non-parole period effectively already served and a short balance term was appropriate.
Court Disposition
Sentence imposed; offender sentenced to imprisonment with release to parole directed on 23 July 2007.
Orders
- ['The offender was convicted of being an accessory after the fact to murder.' 'The offender was sentenced to imprisonment consisting of a non-parole period of twelve months less three days to date from 26 July 2006 and expiring on 23 July 2007, with a balance term of four months commencing on 24 July 2007.' 'The...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment