R v Lambroglou [2024] NSWSC 829
The offender's conduct in providing and maintaining concealment of the Hyundai after knowing the shooters had murdered Rami Iskandar, assisting an OMCG by affixing cloned plates and positioning vehicles while knowingly participating in a criminal group, and possessing and counting $561,450 for an OMCG justified significant imprisonment. The accessory offence was at the low end of the mid-range, the criminal group offence just within the mid-range, and the proceeds of crime offence high in the mid-range. The offender received a 25% discount for the accessory offence under s 25E and 10% discounts for the other counts, with his facilitation of justice, remorse, good rehabilitation prospects,...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentencing / Sentence After Guilty Pleas to Accessory After the Fact to Murder, Participating in a Criminal Group, and Dealing With Property Suspected of Being Proceeds of Crime
- Outcome
- The offender was sentenced to an aggregate sentence of imprisonment for 4 years 6 months commencing 8 October 2022 and expiring 7 April 2027, with a non-parole period of 3 years expiring 7 October 2025. The offences on the s 166 Certificate were dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['accessory After the Fact to Murder' 'participating in a Criminal Group' 'proceeds of Crime' 'guilty Plea Discount' 'aggregate Sentence' 'special Circumstances' 'outlaw Motorcycle Gang Offending']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing / Sentence After Guilty Pleas to Accessory After the Fact to Murder, Participating in a Criminal Group, and Dealing With Property Suspected of Being Proceeds of Crime
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Assessment of the objective seriousness of the offences of accessory after the fact to murder, participating in a criminal group, and dealing with property suspected of being proceeds of crime.' 'Whether the offender was entitled to a 25% or 10% discount for the guilty pleas under Division 1A of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW).' "Whether the offender's subjective circumstances, remorse, rehabilitation prospects, custody conditions and special circumstances affected sentence." 'Whether an aggregate sentence was appropriate and whether offences on the s 166 Certificate should be dismissed.']
Ratio Decidendi
The offender's conduct in providing and maintaining concealment of the Hyundai after knowing the shooters had murdered Rami Iskandar, assisting an OMCG by affixing cloned plates and positioning vehicles while knowingly participating in a criminal group, and possessing and counting $561,450 for an OMCG justified significant imprisonment. The accessory offence was at the low end of the mid-range, the criminal group offence just within the mid-range, and the proceeds of crime offence high in the mid-range. The offender received a 25% discount for the accessory offence under s 25E and 10% discounts for the other counts, with his facilitation of justice, remorse, good rehabilitation prospects,...
Court Disposition
The offender was sentenced to an aggregate sentence of imprisonment for 4 years 6 months commencing 8 October 2022 and expiring 7 April 2027, with a non-parole period of 3 years expiring 7 October 2025. The offences on the s 166 Certificate were dismissed.
Orders
- ['Vincent Bill Lambroglou is sentenced to an aggregate sentence of imprisonment for 4 years 6 months commencing 8 October 2022 and expiring 7 April 2027.' 'A non-parole period of 3 years is fixed, expiring 7 October 2025.' 'The offender is first eligible for parole on 7 October 2025.' 'The offences on the s 166...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment