R v Christos Tsekas (No. 2) [2018] NSWDC 188
Access to the DVD recording of the accused's ERISP interview and photographs of the victim and accused's injuries was refused to protect privacy and welfare, but access to the transcript of the interview, photographs of the knife, and crime scene photographs was granted in the interests of open justice.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown); Accused: Christos Tsekas
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 July 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Post Verdict Application by Non Parties for Access to Material
- Outcome
- Orders granting partial access to non-party applicants (media)
- Legal Topics
- Access to Court Documents, Open Justice, Media Access, Mental Illness Verdict
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
Prosecution
Christos Tsekas
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Post Verdict Application by Non Parties for Access to Material
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether non-party media applicants should be granted access to the accused's ERISP interview, transcript, and certain photographs held by the court
Ratio Decidendi
Access to the DVD recording of the accused's ERISP interview and photographs of the victim and accused's injuries was refused to protect privacy and welfare, but access to the transcript of the interview, photographs of the knife, and crime scene photographs was granted in the interests of open justice.
Court Disposition
Orders granting partial access to non-party applicants (media)
Orders
- Registrar to grant Mr Evan Batten and Ms Leonie Ryan access to Exhibit B (transcript of the accused's ERISP interview)
- Registrar to grant access to Exhibit A.13 (photographs including the knife)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment