John Cooke & Company Pty Ltd v The Commonwealth [1924] UKPCHCA 2

John Cooke & Company Pty Ltd v The Commonwealth [1924] UKPCHCA 2

The only binding arrangement was between the Imperial and Commonwealth Governments, with the Commonwealth acting as the agent for the British (Imperial) Government, not for the wool-owners. There was no contract entitling suppliers of skin wool to participate in the distribution of profits for the 1918–1919 and 1919–1920 wool clips; acceptance of appraisement terms excluding profit participation was a precondition for sale. No relationship of principal and agent existed between the Commonwealth Government and wool-owners with respect to profits beyond the flat rate, and no goods were requisitioned under compulsion.

Parties
Appellants: John Cooke and Company Proprietary Limited and others; Respondents: The Commonwealth of Australia and others; Added Defendants (representatives of Shorn Wool Suppliers): Mackay and Murphy
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 March 1924
Procedural Posture
Appeal / On Appeal From the High Court of Australia; Judgment Delivered by Privy Council
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Acquisition of Australian Wool Clips During WWI, Distribution of Profits From Government Acquisition, War Precautions Regulations, Agency Relationship Between Governments and Suppliers
Contract Law Evidence Administrative Law Acquisition of Australian Wool Clips During WWI Distribution of Profits From Government Acquisition War Precautions Regulations Agency Relationship Between Governments and Suppliers

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Cooke and Company Proprietary Limited and others

Appellants

The Commonwealth of Australia and others

Respondents

Mackay and Murphy

Added Defendants (representatives of Shorn Wool Suppliers)

Procedural Posture

Appeal / On Appeal From the High Court of Australia; Judgment Delivered by Privy Council

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there was a contract between the Imperial Government and Australian wool-owners entitling suppliers of skin wool to share profits beyond the fixed price
  2. 2 Whether Commonwealth Government acted as agent for wool-owners or Imperial Government
  3. 3 Whether exclusion of skin wool suppliers from profit distribution for 1918–1919 and 1919–1920 was enforceable

Ratio Decidendi

The only binding arrangement was between the Imperial and Commonwealth Governments, with the Commonwealth acting as the agent for the British (Imperial) Government, not for the wool-owners. There was no contract entitling suppliers of skin wool to participate in the distribution of profits for the 1918–1919 and 1919–1920 wool clips; acceptance of appraisement terms excluding profit participation was a precondition for sale. No relationship of principal and agent existed between the Commonwealth Government and wool-owners with respect to profits beyond the flat rate, and no goods were requisitioned under compulsion.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Action fails; suppliers of skin wool have no cause of action for share of profits
  • Privy Council advises His Majesty that appeal be dismissed with costs