Conway, Gerard v Mogensen, Jan [1998] FCA 711
No formal or effective stay existed at the time of the issue or service of the bankruptcy notice; the debtor's rehearing application was out of time and therefore not a jurisdictional basis to stay execution on the judgment. Consequently, the requirements of s 40(1)(g) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 for an act of bankruptcy were satisfied.
- Parties
- Creditor: Gerard Conway; Debtor: Jan Mogensen
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Creditor's Petition (bankruptcy) / Interlocutory Application Hearing on Opposition to Act of Bankruptcy
- Outcome
- Costs reserved; matter stood over for further hearing.
- Legal Topics
- Act of Bankruptcy, Stay of Execution, Final Judgment, Consumer Claims Tribunal, Jurisdictional Fact
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gerard Conway
Creditor
Jan Mogensen
Debtor
Procedural Posture
Creditor's Petition (bankruptcy) / Interlocutory Application Hearing on Opposition to Act of Bankruptcy
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was a final judgment or order the execution of which had not been stayed at the time of issue or service of the bankruptcy notice
- 2 Whether the debtor was entitled to a stay when application for rehearing to the Tribunal was made out of time
Ratio Decidendi
No formal or effective stay existed at the time of the issue or service of the bankruptcy notice; the debtor's rehearing application was out of time and therefore not a jurisdictional basis to stay execution on the judgment. Consequently, the requirements of s 40(1)(g) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 for an act of bankruptcy were satisfied.
Court Disposition
Costs reserved; matter stood over for further hearing.
Orders
- Costs reserved.
- Matter stood over until 5 June 1998.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment