R v Craig Andrew Woodley [2013] NSWDC 14
The combined course of predatory and exploitative conduct by the offender—including the indecent act, exposing the victim to indecent material, and provision of amphetamines to a person under 16 with intent to procure unlawful sexual activity—constituted criminality of high seriousness, warranting concurrent terms of imprisonment. No alternative to full-time custody was appropriate; the need for rehabilitation and special circumstances justified a shorter non-parole period than usual statutory proportions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 February 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentencing / Sentence
- Outcome
- Offender convicted on all three counts; sentenced to concurrent terms of imprisonment totalling 3 years and 4 months with specific non-parole periods as detailed in orders.
- Legal Topics
- ['act of Indecency' 'grooming a Child' 'exposure to Indecent Material' 'provision of Intoxicating Substance' 'sentencing' 'sexual Offences Against Children']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Objective seriousness of indecency and grooming offences' 'Appropriate sentence for acts of indecency and grooming under Crimes Act' "Assessment of offender's risk and character in sentencing" 'Aggravating and mitigating factors under Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999' 'Application of totality and proportionality in sentencing']
Ratio Decidendi
The combined course of predatory and exploitative conduct by the offender—including the indecent act, exposing the victim to indecent material, and provision of amphetamines to a person under 16 with intent to procure unlawful sexual activity—constituted criminality of high seriousness, warranting concurrent terms of imprisonment. No alternative to full-time custody was appropriate; the need for rehabilitation and special circumstances justified a shorter non-parole period than usual statutory proportions.
Court Disposition
Offender convicted on all three counts; sentenced to concurrent terms of imprisonment totalling 3 years and 4 months with specific non-parole periods as detailed in orders.
Orders
- ['Count 1: Convicted and sentenced to 6 months imprisonment (26 October 2012 - 25 April 2013).' 'Count 2: Convicted and sentenced to 2 years imprisonment (26 October 2012 - 25 October 2014), concurrent.' 'Count 3: Convicted and sentenced to 2 years non-parole (26 April 2013 - 25 April 2015) and 1 year 4 months...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment