Wade v Golden Manly Management Services Pty Ltd trading as Fantastic Aussie Tours [2009] NSWSC 239

Wade v Golden Manly Management Services Pty Ltd trading as Fantastic Aussie Tours [2009] NSWSC 239

The Magistrate's reasons were inadequate because they did not disclose how the critical factual issue was determined, namely the tension between the unchallenged evidence that Mrs Wade was travelling in the right hand lane when the bus began to merge and the bus driver's evidence that he looked in his mirror and did not see her. The reasons contained inconsistent premises, did not grapple with Mr Pospisil's evidence, and did not enable the plaintiffs or the Court to understand why the plaintiffs lost. In the circumstances, justice was not seen to be done and the decision was erroneous in point of law under s 73(1) Local Courts Act 1982. Because further findings of fact, including on...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 April 2009
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Local Court Dismissal of Negligence Claim for Damage to a Van / Principal Judgment in Supreme Court of New South Wales, Common Law Division, on Appeal Under S 73(1) Local Courts Act 1982
Outcome
Appeal allowed; Local Court dismissal set aside and matter remitted to the Local Court for further determination.
Legal Topics
['adequacy of Reasons' 'error of Law' 'duty to Give Reasons' 'local Court Appeal' 'remittal' 'contributory Negligence']
['civil Procedure' 'negligence' 'motor Vehicle Accidents' 'appeals'] ['adequacy of Reasons' 'error of Law' 'duty to Give Reasons' 'local Court Appeal' 'remittal' 'contributory Negligence']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Local Court Dismissal of Negligence Claim for Damage to a Van / Principal Judgment in Supreme Court of New South Wales, Common Law Division, on Appeal Under S 73(1) Local Courts Act 1982

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the Magistrate failed to give sufficient reasons for dismissing the plaintiffs' Local Court claim." 'Whether any failure to give reasons constituted an error of law within s 73(1) Local Courts Act 1982.' 'Whether the Supreme Court should enter a verdict for the plaintiffs or remit the matter for further determination.']

Ratio Decidendi

The Magistrate's reasons were inadequate because they did not disclose how the critical factual issue was determined, namely the tension between the unchallenged evidence that Mrs Wade was travelling in the right hand lane when the bus began to merge and the bus driver's evidence that he looked in his mirror and did not see her. The reasons contained inconsistent premises, did not grapple with Mr Pospisil's evidence, and did not enable the plaintiffs or the Court to understand why the plaintiffs lost. In the circumstances, justice was not seen to be done and the decision was erroneous in point of law under s 73(1) Local Courts Act 1982. Because further findings of fact, including on...

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; Local Court dismissal set aside and matter remitted to the Local Court for further determination.

Orders

  • ['That the order of the Magistrate dismissing the action in the Local Court be set aside.' 'That the matter be remitted to the Local Court for determination in accordance with these directions.' "That the defendants pay the plaintiffs' costs of these proceedings." 'That the costs of the proceedings below abide the...