R v Nguon & Ream [2014] NSWDC 385
The police-prepared transcripts of the English-language covert recordings should not be provided to the jury as aides memoire due to the risk of distraction, unfair prejudice, unreliability, and lack of relevant ad hoc expertise; the enhanced audio recording may be tendered in evidence, as its probative value outweighs potential for confusion or waste of time, and any such risks can be addressed by directions to the jury.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 March 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Trial (ruling on Evidentiary Matters)
- Outcome
- Transcripts not permitted as aides memoire; enhanced audio recording admissible
- Legal Topics
- ['ad Hoc Expert' 'transcript of Covert Recordings' 'trial Procedure' 'use of Transcript as Aide Memoire']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Trial (ruling on Evidentiary Matters)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Should police-prepared transcripts of covert English-language recordings be provided to the jury as aide memoire?' 'Is the enhanced audio recording admissible or should it be excluded (Evidence Act s 135)?']
Ratio Decidendi
The police-prepared transcripts of the English-language covert recordings should not be provided to the jury as aides memoire due to the risk of distraction, unfair prejudice, unreliability, and lack of relevant ad hoc expertise; the enhanced audio recording may be tendered in evidence, as its probative value outweighs potential for confusion or waste of time, and any such risks can be addressed by directions to the jury.
Court Disposition
Transcripts not permitted as aides memoire; enhanced audio recording admissible
Orders
- ['Transcripts of unenhanced and enhanced recordings not to be provided to jury as aides memoire' 'Enhanced audio recording may be tendered in evidence']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment