Ellis v Newton [2012] NSWCA 22
The interlocutory decision to refuse an adjournment affected the final result, thus the appeal is competent and the notice of motion to dismiss for incompetence is dismissed with costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Notice of Motion to Dismiss Appeal for Incompetence
- Outcome
- Notice of motion to dismiss for incompetence dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['adjournment' 'appeal Competence' 'interlocutory Decisions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Notice of Motion to Dismiss Appeal for Incompetence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the interlocutory decision to refuse an adjournment affected the final result and rendered the appeal competent']
Ratio Decidendi
The interlocutory decision to refuse an adjournment affected the final result, thus the appeal is competent and the notice of motion to dismiss for incompetence is dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Notice of motion to dismiss for incompetence dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Notice of motion to dismiss for incompetence is dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment