R v Kilincer (No. 7) [2022] NSWSC 1734

R v Kilincer (No. 7) [2022] NSWSC 1734

The application for adjournment was refused because the evidence provided by the accused was insufficient to demonstrate a serious enough health risk to warrant further interruption of the advanced trial.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 August 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Trial Interlocutory Application for Adjournment
Outcome
Application to adjourn trial refused
Legal Topics
['adjournment' 'trial Procedure' 'murder Trial' 'absence of Accused' 'evidentiary Sufficiency for Adjournment']
['criminal Law' 'procedure'] ['adjournment' 'trial Procedure' 'murder Trial' 'absence of Accused' 'evidentiary Sufficiency for Adjournment']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Trial Interlocutory Application for Adjournment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the accused's application for adjournment of the trial should be granted based on alleged ill health and supporting evidence"]

Ratio Decidendi

The application for adjournment was refused because the evidence provided by the accused was insufficient to demonstrate a serious enough health risk to warrant further interruption of the advanced trial.

Court Disposition

Application to adjourn trial refused

Orders

  • ['Application for adjournment refused' 'Accused and jurors to attend court at 10am the following day']