R v Biggs [2007] NSWSC 933
There was no suggestion of judge shopping, the adjournment was necessary to comply with statutory requirements, and granting the adjournment would promote the efficient conduct of the trial consistent with the wishes of both accused and Crown. Therefore, the adjournment was properly granted to permit the election for trial by judge alone before the re-fixed trial date.
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Accused: John David Biggs
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 August 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Adjournment Application Prior to Commencement of Trial
- Outcome
- Adjournment granted
- Legal Topics
- Adjournment, Trial by Judge Alone, Mental Illness Defence, Substantial Impairment Defence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
John David Biggs
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Adjournment Application Prior to Commencement of Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an adjournment should be granted to permit election for trial by judge alone under s 132(4) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW)
- 2 Interpretation of 'date fixed for the person's trial' under s 132(4)
- 3 Whether the application constitutes 'judge shopping'
Ratio Decidendi
There was no suggestion of judge shopping, the adjournment was necessary to comply with statutory requirements, and granting the adjournment would promote the efficient conduct of the trial consistent with the wishes of both accused and Crown. Therefore, the adjournment was properly granted to permit the election for trial by judge alone before the re-fixed trial date.
Court Disposition
Adjournment granted
Orders
- Trial adjourned to permit accused to file election for trial by judge alone pursuant to s 132 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment