The Trust Company (PTAL) Pty Ltd v Romeo (No 6) [2013] NSWSC 1454

The further adjournment application was refused as no evidentiary basis was established and Mr Romeo declined to give evidence in support of the application.

Parties: First Plaintiff: The Trust Company (PTAL) Pty Ltd (Formerly known as Permanent Trustee Australia Limited); Second Plaintiff: Balmain Fund Administration Ltd; First Defendant: Giuseppe Romeo; Second Defendant: Anna Maria Romeo
Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 01 October 2013
Procedural Posture: Interlocutory Application / Application for Further Adjournment
Outcome: Application for further adjournment refused.
Legal Topics: Adjournment, Interlocutory Application

Civil Procedure Adjournment Interlocutory Application

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

The Trust Company (PTAL) Pty Ltd (Formerly known as Permanent Trustee Australia Limited)

First Plaintiff

Balmain Fund Administration Ltd

Second Plaintiff

Giuseppe Romeo

First Defendant

Anna Maria Romeo

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application / Application for Further Adjournment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the further adjournment application should be granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The further adjournment application was refused as no evidentiary basis was established and Mr Romeo declined to give evidence in support of the application.

Court Disposition

Application for further adjournment refused.

Orders

Further adjournment application refused.