Warwick Hill Pty Ltd trading as Warwick Hill Lawyer v Lovell [2019] NSWDC 248

Warwick Hill Pty Ltd trading as Warwick Hill Lawyer v Lovell [2019] NSWDC 248

The adjournment was granted because the cross-claimant and his principal witnesses had serious health problems, there were tragic family circumstances, and the proceedings were in any event not truly ready for hearing because of uncertainty in the pleadings and evidence. Applying the dictates of justice and taking a holistic case management approach, the appropriate course was to adjourn, require clarification of the cross-claim and losses, direct mediation, and fix a new hearing date, while warning that any further adjournment would require exceptional circumstances.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 May 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Proceedings Involving a Professional Negligence Cross Claim Against Former Solicitors / Cross Claimant's Application to Adjourn or Vacate the Hearing
Outcome
Cross-claimant's application for adjournment granted; directions made; costs reserved.
Legal Topics
['adjournment of Hearing' 'case Management' 'litigant in Person' 'mediation' 'country Circuit Hearings']
['civil Procedure' 'professional Negligence'] ['adjournment of Hearing' 'case Management' 'litigant in Person' 'mediation' 'country Circuit Hearings']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil Proceedings Involving a Professional Negligence Cross Claim Against Former Solicitors / Cross Claimant's Application to Adjourn or Vacate the Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the cross-claimant's application to adjourn the hearing should be granted because of serious health and family problems affecting him and his principal witnesses." 'Whether the dictates of justice and case management considerations under the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) supported adjournment despite late notice and circuit listing difficulties.' 'Whether the state of the pleadings and evidence showed that the proceedings were not ready for hearing.']

Ratio Decidendi

The adjournment was granted because the cross-claimant and his principal witnesses had serious health problems, there were tragic family circumstances, and the proceedings were in any event not truly ready for hearing because of uncertainty in the pleadings and evidence. Applying the dictates of justice and taking a holistic case management approach, the appropriate course was to adjourn, require clarification of the cross-claim and losses, direct mediation, and fix a new hearing date, while warning that any further adjournment would require exceptional circumstances.

Court Disposition

Cross-claimant's application for adjournment granted; directions made; costs reserved.

Orders

  • ["On the application of the cross-claimant, by reason of his own and his principal witnesses' serious health problems, the cross-claimant's application for the adjournment of these proceedings is granted." 'Cross-claimant to file and serve an Amended Cross-Claim by 13 June 2019.' 'The cross-claimant to serve further...