In the Estate of Coe [2013] NSWSC 968

In the Estate of Coe [2013] NSWSC 968

The Court refused to appoint an administrator ad litem at this stage because the proposed appointment was an extreme step that would make the administrator a true representative of the estate within the limits of the grant, yet the executor had not been made a party or cited to prove the will, the scope and form of the proposed administration had not been adequately addressed, the need for an administration bond had not been considered, and there was no evidence that the proposed administrator was independent and understood the possible fiduciary obligations. The matter should instead proceed by making or citing the executor, by an order in the Re Byrne form giving the estate a further...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 July 2013
Procedural Posture
Application for Appointment of an Administrator Ad Litem in the Equity Division Probate List / Ex Parte Application; Order Refused at This Stage and Matter Stood Over to Enable Amendment of Summons
Outcome
Order for appointment of administrator ad litem refused; matter stood over to enable amendment of summons.
Legal Topics
['administrator Ad Litem' 'limited Grants of Administration' 'citation of Executor' 'administration Bond' 'representation of Deceased Estate in Litigation' 'federal Court Proceedings Against Deceased Estate']
['succession' 'probate and Administration' 'civil Procedure'] ['administrator Ad Litem' 'limited Grants of Administration' 'citation of Executor' 'administration Bond' 'representation of Deceased Estate in Litigation' 'federal Court Proceedings Against Deceased Estate']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Appointment of an Administrator Ad Litem in the Equity Division Probate List / Ex Parte Application; Order Refused at This Stage and Matter Stood Over to Enable Amendment of Summons

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the Court should appoint an administrator ad litem to represent the deceased's estate for proposed Federal Court proceedings when no grant of administration had been made." "Whether the executor named in the deceased's alleged will should first be cited or otherwise given an opportunity to take out probate." 'Whether the proposed order adequately defined the scope of the limited administration.' 'Whether an administration bond was required.' 'Whether evidence was required that the proposed administrator was independent and understood possible fiduciary duties.' 'Whether the proposed Federal Court proceedings had sufficient connection with New South Wales for the grant sought.']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court refused to appoint an administrator ad litem at this stage because the proposed appointment was an extreme step that would make the administrator a true representative of the estate within the limits of the grant, yet the executor had not been made a party or cited to prove the will, the scope and form of the proposed administration had not been adequately addressed, the need for an administration bond had not been considered, and there was no evidence that the proposed administrator was independent and understood the possible fiduciary obligations. The matter should instead proceed by making or citing the executor, by an order in the Re Byrne form giving the estate a further...

Court Disposition

Order for appointment of administrator ad litem refused; matter stood over to enable amendment of summons.

Orders

  • ['Order for appointment of administrator ad litem refused.' 'Matter stood over to enable amendment of summons.']