Andonovski v Park-Tec Engineering Pty Ltd & Anor; Andonovski v East Realisations Pty Limited Formerly t/as Westbus Pty Ltd (No 5) [2013] NSWSC 1964

Andonovski v Park-Tec Engineering Pty Ltd & Anor; Andonovski v East Realisations Pty Limited Formerly t/as Westbus Pty Ltd (No 5) [2013] NSWSC 1964

The tendered workers compensation renewal documents were not covered by the previous ruling concerning individual wage records for the plaintiff, so the document was admissible as Exhibit 2D8.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 December 2013
Procedural Posture
Common Law / Procedural and Other Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence
Outcome
The document was admitted as Exhibit 2D8.
Legal Topics
['admissibility' 'tender of Documents' 'workers Compensation Policy Renewal Documents']
['evidence'] ['admissibility' 'tender of Documents' 'workers Compensation Policy Renewal Documents']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Common Law / Procedural and Other Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether documents relating to the renewal of a workers compensation policy issued to Park-Tec Engineering Pty Ltd, including a Renewal Declaration Form, should be admitted into evidence.']

Ratio Decidendi

The tendered workers compensation renewal documents were not covered by the previous ruling concerning individual wage records for the plaintiff, so the document was admissible as Exhibit 2D8.

Court Disposition

The document was admitted as Exhibit 2D8.

Orders

  • ['I admit the document as Exhibit 2D8.']