R v Warwick (No.40) [2018] NSWSC 1283
The plan was relevant to the adequacy of the investigation and to the consequences and layout of the bombing scene. Although Mr Sheather did not prepare the plan, his position in the investigation, the label on the document, and the type and nature of the document meant that he adequately identified it. The Accused had not tested his knowledge on the voir dire. The plan and copy were therefore admissible.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 August 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Evidence Admissibility Ruling / Procedural and Other Ruling During Criminal Proceedings
- Outcome
- The Photogrammetry Plan of the Kingdom Hall and the copy of it were admitted as Exh 68.
- Legal Topics
- ['admissibility of Crime Scene Plan' 'relevance' 'identification of Document' 'adequacy of Police Investigation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Evidence Admissibility Ruling / Procedural and Other Ruling During Criminal Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Photogrammetry Plan of the Kingdom Hall and a copy of it were relevant and admissible.' 'Whether the plan was adequately identified by Mr Sheather despite not having been prepared by him and despite Detective R N Adams not being called.']
Ratio Decidendi
The plan was relevant to the adequacy of the investigation and to the consequences and layout of the bombing scene. Although Mr Sheather did not prepare the plan, his position in the investigation, the label on the document, and the type and nature of the document meant that he adequately identified it. The Accused had not tested his knowledge on the voir dire. The plan and copy were therefore admissible.
Court Disposition
The Photogrammetry Plan of the Kingdom Hall and the copy of it were admitted as Exh 68.
Orders
- ['The Photogrammetry Plan of the Kingdom Hall and the copy of it admitted as Exh 68.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment