R v Wiggins [2021] NSWSC 719
The police stop evidence was relevant because, if accepted, it could rationally affect the assessment of whether the accused had an interest in Darko Janceski and a motive to kill him, and its moderate probative value was not outweighed by any danger of unfair prejudice where appropriate directions could address how the Crown put its case. The MMA recordings had significant probative value because Slobodan Janceski described the gunman as having kickboxing skills, and the videos showed the accused's proficiency in that sport; organised legal kickboxing or MMA did not of itself raise bad character or a tendency to violence, and the risk of unfair prejudice could be addressed by further...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 June 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Procedure Evidentiary Rulings in Prosecution for Murder and Intentional Infliction of Grievous Bodily Harm / Pre Trial Hearing on Notice of Motion Dated 4 June 2021 Seeking Exclusion of Evidence
- Outcome
- Application to exclude the police stop evidence and the edited MMA recordings refused; ruling on the birth certificate deferred; telephone intercept editing left for the parties to attempt to resolve; coincidence issue left for later clarification if necessary.
- Legal Topics
- ['admissibility of Evidence' 'relevance' 'unfair Prejudice' 'coincidence Rule' 'circumstantial Evidence' 'motive' 'mixed Martial Arts Evidence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Procedure Evidentiary Rulings in Prosecution for Murder and Intentional Infliction of Grievous Bodily Harm / Pre Trial Hearing on Notice of Motion Dated 4 June 2021 Seeking Exclusion of Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether evidence that the accused drove slowly past the deceased's house after a suspicious house fire on 5 November 2011 was relevant and admissible." 'Whether evidence of the police vehicle stop should be excluded under s 137 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW).' 'Whether videos of the accused competing in mixed martial arts bouts should be excluded because of unfair prejudice.' "Whether evidence of the accused's birth certificate recording his mother's birthplace was relevant or should be excluded." 'Whether issues concerning telephone intercept edits and the Crown\'s use of the word "coincidences" required determination at the pre-trial hearing.']
Ratio Decidendi
The police stop evidence was relevant because, if accepted, it could rationally affect the assessment of whether the accused had an interest in Darko Janceski and a motive to kill him, and its moderate probative value was not outweighed by any danger of unfair prejudice where appropriate directions could address how the Crown put its case. The MMA recordings had significant probative value because Slobodan Janceski described the gunman as having kickboxing skills, and the videos showed the accused's proficiency in that sport; organised legal kickboxing or MMA did not of itself raise bad character or a tendency to violence, and the risk of unfair prejudice could be addressed by further...
Court Disposition
Application to exclude the police stop evidence and the edited MMA recordings refused; ruling on the birth certificate deferred; telephone intercept editing left for the parties to attempt to resolve; coincidence issue left for later clarification if necessary.
Orders
- ["The evidence of the accused driving slowly past the deceased's home after the fire on 5 November 2011 is admissible." 'The recordings of the accused competing in MMA bouts are admissible subject to further editing of any footage of the accused punching his opponent to the head while his opponent is already on the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment