R v Turnbull (No. 9) [2016] NSWSC 781
The letter was not admitted because, at the time of the tender, the Court was unpersuaded that it was relevant and admissible under ss.55 and 56 Evidence Act 1995; its apparent seizure under the search warrant did not make it admissible, and there were fundamental difficulties with its relevance and potential use absent evidence from the Accused about his state of mind.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 April 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Murder Trial / Procedural Evidentiary Ruling During Cross Examination on Defence Tender of Letter (mfi8)
- Outcome
- Defence tender of letter (MFI8) rejected.
- Legal Topics
- ['admissibility of Evidence' 'relevance' "accused's State of Mind" 'client Legal Privilege' 'search Warrant']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Murder Trial / Procedural Evidentiary Ruling During Cross Examination on Defence Tender of Letter (mfi8)
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether a letter dated 4 July 2014 from the Accused's solicitor to the Accused was relevant and admissible in the murder trial." 'Whether the fact that the letter was apparently seized by police in execution of a search warrant rendered it admissible.' "Whether the letter could be admitted as evidence bearing on the Accused's state of mind, not as evidence of the truth of its contents."]
Ratio Decidendi
The letter was not admitted because, at the time of the tender, the Court was unpersuaded that it was relevant and admissible under ss.55 and 56 Evidence Act 1995; its apparent seizure under the search warrant did not make it admissible, and there were fundamental difficulties with its relevance and potential use absent evidence from the Accused about his state of mind.
Court Disposition
Defence tender of letter (MFI8) rejected.
Orders
- ['Defence tender of letter (MFI8) rejected.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment