R v Fitzpatrick (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 836
The materials are admissible because they provide evidence relevant to the accused's knowledge of improvised explosive devices, which is pertinent to whether he had the requisite capacity and opportunity to commit the offence, and are not exclusively tendency evidence requiring satisfaction of Pt 3.6 Evidence Act 1995. Risks of misuse can be effectively mitigated by judicial directions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 July 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence (voir Dire) Prior to Jury Empanelment
- Outcome
- Application to admit evidence allowed
- Legal Topics
- ['admissibility of Evidence' 'tendency Evidence' 'circumstantial Evidence' 'evidence Act 1995 (nsw)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence (voir Dire) Prior to Jury Empanelment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Admissibility of Exhibit Voir Dire 1 (documents on explosive devices) under Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)' 'Admissibility of nail package as evidence of state of mind/knowledge' 'Whether materials should be characterised and treated as tendency evidence' 'Risk of misuse or undue prejudice if evidence admitted']
Ratio Decidendi
The materials are admissible because they provide evidence relevant to the accused's knowledge of improvised explosive devices, which is pertinent to whether he had the requisite capacity and opportunity to commit the offence, and are not exclusively tendency evidence requiring satisfaction of Pt 3.6 Evidence Act 1995. Risks of misuse can be effectively mitigated by judicial directions.
Court Disposition
Application to admit evidence allowed
Orders
- ['The material constituting Exhibit Voir Dire 1 is admissible' 'The nail package depicted in photographs annexed to Exhibit Voir Dire 4 is admissible']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment