R v Bentley; R v Davies; R v Thomas; R v Tilley [2018] NSWSC 195

R v Bentley; R v Davies; R v Thomas; R v Tilley [2018] NSWSC 195

All listening device material is admissible as it is relevant to the issues in the case and is not unfairly prejudicial.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
26 February 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Evidentiary Ruling
Outcome
Listening device material admitted
Legal Topics
['admissibility of Evidence' 'listening Device Material' 'relevance' 'prejudice']
['evidence' 'criminal Law'] ['admissibility of Evidence' 'listening Device Material' 'relevance' 'prejudice']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Evidentiary Ruling

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether listening device material is admissible in evidence' 'Whether the material is relevant' 'Whether the material is unfairly prejudicial']

Ratio Decidendi

All listening device material is admissible as it is relevant to the issues in the case and is not unfairly prejudicial.

Court Disposition

Listening device material admitted

Orders

  • ['The listening device product is admissible']