R v Pratten (No 19) [2015] NSWSC 1111
The notices of assessment were indirectly relevant to a fact in issue because they bore on the source of income or benefits allegedly used by Mr Pratten during the charge years and on whether those monies might have been earlier accumulated wealth. Any risk of unfair prejudice arising from the jury's treatment of the assessments could be overcome by appropriate directions, so the documents were admissible.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Proceeding / Admissibility Ruling on Voir Dire
- Outcome
- Documents admitted
- Legal Topics
- ['admissibility of Evidence' 'relevance' 'unfair Prejudice' 'income Tax Assessments' 'jury Directions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Proceeding / Admissibility Ruling on Voir Dire
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether notices of assessment of income tax issued for tax years ending 30 June 1993 through to 30 June 2002 were relevant to the proceedings.' 'Whether admission of the notices of assessment would cause unfair prejudice to the accused because of a risk that the jury would speculate as to their veracity.']
Ratio Decidendi
The notices of assessment were indirectly relevant to a fact in issue because they bore on the source of income or benefits allegedly used by Mr Pratten during the charge years and on whether those monies might have been earlier accumulated wealth. Any risk of unfair prejudice arising from the jury's treatment of the assessments could be overcome by appropriate directions, so the documents were admissible.
Court Disposition
Documents admitted
Orders
- ['The documents, comprising notices of assessment of income tax issued for the tax years ending 30 June 1993 to 30 June 2002, are admissible.' 'The documents are allowed to be tendered.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment