Glass v Demarco [1999] FCA 482
Evidence of settlement negotiations was inadmissible as neither s131(2)(g) nor s131(2)(i) applied; no relevant inference likely to mislead the court, nor an existing right affected by the offer. No sufficient basis was established for granting an extension of time to file further affidavits or pay the required sum into court. The debtor’s applications were refused.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 April 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Petition / Interlocutory Application for Extension of Time and Evidentiary Rulings
- Outcome
- Application for extension of time refused. Debtor ordered to pay costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['admissibility of Evidence of Settlement Negotiations' 'application for Extension of Time' 'payment of Money Into Court']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Petition / Interlocutory Application for Extension of Time and Evidentiary Rulings
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether evidence of settlement negotiations is admissible under Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s131(1)' 'Whether exceptions in s131(2)(g) or s131(2)(i) apply to permit admissibility' 'Whether debtor should be granted extension of time to file further affidavits or pay money into court']
Ratio Decidendi
Evidence of settlement negotiations was inadmissible as neither s131(2)(g) nor s131(2)(i) applied; no relevant inference likely to mislead the court, nor an existing right affected by the offer. No sufficient basis was established for granting an extension of time to file further affidavits or pay the required sum into court. The debtor’s applications were refused.
Court Disposition
Application for extension of time refused. Debtor ordered to pay costs.
Orders
- ['The application by the debtor for an extension of time within which to file further affidavits and to pay money into Court be refused.' 'The debtor pay the costs of today.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment