N.V. Sumatra Tobacco Trading Company v British American Tobacco Australia Services Limited [2011] FCA 255
Having regard to Mr Mack's 28 years of experience in the tobacco industry, he is a witness capable of expressing an opinion based on his experience sufficient for admission under s 79 of the Evidence Act. However, the extent to which weight will be given to such opinions depends on the revealed process of reasoning underlying those opinions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Decision of Delegate of Registrar of Trademarks / Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence in Course of Trial
- Outcome
- Affidavits of Gary Irwin Mack admitted into evidence, subject to further rulings on specific objections in the course of determining final judgment.
- Legal Topics
- ['admissibility of Expert Opinion Evidence' 'trade Mark Registration' 'foundation for Opinion Evidence Under Evidence Act']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Decision of Delegate of Registrar of Trademarks / Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence in Course of Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether affidavits of Mr Gary Irwin Mack should be admitted as opinion evidence under s 79 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth)' 'Whether sufficient foundation of specialised knowledge and experience is established for the expression of opinion']
Ratio Decidendi
Having regard to Mr Mack's 28 years of experience in the tobacco industry, he is a witness capable of expressing an opinion based on his experience sufficient for admission under s 79 of the Evidence Act. However, the extent to which weight will be given to such opinions depends on the revealed process of reasoning underlying those opinions.
Court Disposition
Affidavits of Gary Irwin Mack admitted into evidence, subject to further rulings on specific objections in the course of determining final judgment.
Orders
- ["The affidavits of Gary Irwin Mack sworn 28 April 2009 and 24 March 2010 are admitted into evidence in the trial of the proceeding subject to further rulings upon any objections taken to any parts of the affidavits by the applicant/cross-respondent in relation to Mr Mack's expression of opinion on matters in...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment