R v Tan Phuong LE (No 1) [2010] NSWDC 20

R v Tan Phuong LE (No 1) [2010] NSWDC 20

The court found that the police complied with statutory requirements by providing the required caution in the accused's language through an interpreter and a translated document, and that the accused understood his rights. Therefore, the interview is admissible.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 February 2010
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Admissibility of Interview (voir Dire)
Outcome
Interview admitted into evidence.
Legal Topics
['admissibility of Interview' 'police Cautions' 'interpreter Assistance' 'understanding of Rights' 'evidence Act Compliance']
['criminal Law'] ['admissibility of Interview' 'police Cautions' 'interpreter Assistance' 'understanding of Rights' 'evidence Act Compliance']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Admissibility of Interview (voir Dire)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the police complied with s 139(1)(c) and s 139(3) of the Evidence Act 1995 in cautioning the accused.' 'Whether the accused understood the caution given and the right to silence.' 'Whether the interview should be admitted into evidence given these circumstances.']

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the police complied with statutory requirements by providing the required caution in the accused's language through an interpreter and a translated document, and that the accused understood his rights. Therefore, the interview is admissible.

Court Disposition

Interview admitted into evidence.

Orders

  • ['Interview to be admitted.']