Huon Aquaculture Group Limited v Secretary, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment [2017] FCA 1615

Huon Aquaculture Group Limited v Secretary, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment [2017] FCA 1615

The objected evidence (various environmental, scientific reports) is admissible for the purpose of demonstrating the applicants' subjective beliefs and concerns, but not to prove as objective fact the existence or cause of environmental harm unless the underlying data (such as dissolved oxygen readings) itself constitutes objective evidence; a limiting order under s 136 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) is made accordingly.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 December 2017
Procedural Posture
Administrative Law Proceedings / Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence (interlocutory Decision)
Outcome
Limiting order made; opinion evidence restricted in use
Legal Topics
['admissibility of Opinion Evidence' 'limitation of Evidence Use' 'expert Evidence Requirements' 'discretionary Grounds for Relief']
['evidence Law' 'administrative Law' 'environmental Law'] ['admissibility of Opinion Evidence' 'limitation of Evidence Use' 'expert Evidence Requirements' 'discretionary Grounds for Relief']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Administrative Law Proceedings / Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence (interlocutory Decision)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether opinion evidence contained in various annexed reports is admissible under the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth)' 'Whether such evidence can be used to prove the truth of facts expressed therein, or only for the applicants’ subjective understanding' 'Whether s 77 of the Evidence Act permits admission for a purpose other than proof of existence of fact' 'Whether a limiting order under s 136 of the Evidence Act should be made' 'Whether s 190(3) applies to matters not genuinely in dispute' 'Whether evidence is admissible as admissions under s 81']

Ratio Decidendi

The objected evidence (various environmental, scientific reports) is admissible for the purpose of demonstrating the applicants' subjective beliefs and concerns, but not to prove as objective fact the existence or cause of environmental harm unless the underlying data (such as dissolved oxygen readings) itself constitutes objective evidence; a limiting order under s 136 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) is made accordingly.

Court Disposition

Limiting order made; opinion evidence restricted in use

Orders

  • ['Subject to further or other order, pursuant to section 136 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), specified reports (FRB-14, FRB-20, FRB-38, FRB-39, FRB-40, FRB-41) may not be used to prove the truth of any fact about the existence of which an opinion was expressed in that evidence, except to the extent that the data...