R v Warwick (No.42) [2018] NSWSC 1292
The detail of Mr Sheather's evidence about what he removed from the Kingdom Hall was not inconsistent with his description, and the evidence concerning packaging, retention, movement records, DFM records and DFM allocated numbers established a proper factual basis for identification of the items. On that basis, the photographs and the original cardboard item were admissible.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 August 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Common Law Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Admissibility of Photographs and Cardboard From Crime Scene
- Outcome
- Photographs and the original item the subject of the photographs admitted and marked as Exhibit 74.
- Legal Topics
- ['admissibility of Physical Evidence' 'admissibility of Photographs' 'identification of Exhibits' 'continuity of Evidence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Common Law Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Admissibility of Photographs and Cardboard From Crime Scene
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether two photographs showing a piece of cardboard allegedly recovered from the Kingdom Hall at Casula shortly after the bombing on 21 July 1985 should be admitted into evidence.' 'Whether the piece of cardboard shown in the photographs should be admitted into evidence despite the witness having no specific memory of collecting it.']
Ratio Decidendi
The detail of Mr Sheather's evidence about what he removed from the Kingdom Hall was not inconsistent with his description, and the evidence concerning packaging, retention, movement records, DFM records and DFM allocated numbers established a proper factual basis for identification of the items. On that basis, the photographs and the original cardboard item were admissible.
Court Disposition
Photographs and the original item the subject of the photographs admitted and marked as Exhibit 74.
Orders
- ['The photographs and the original item the subject of the photographs are admitted and marked as Exh 74.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment