Re WS (No 3) [2017] NSWSC 1160
The application for adoption is dismissed because the Court is not satisfied, on the evidence, that making an adoption order is in the best interests of the child or is clearly preferable to other available legal actions. There is insufficient evidence that the adoption will secure the stability, security, or benefits claimed, particularly as the proceedings’ main purpose is to secure an immigration visa, and there is no evidence that the order will assure the child’s return or right to remain in Australia. The statutory requirements for best interests and clear preferability were not met.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Ms SS; Second Plaintiff: Mr PGH; Child: Child WS (via Separate Representative); First Defendant: Secretary, Department of Family & Community Services
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 August 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Application by Relatives / Final Judgment – Application for Making Adoption Order
- Outcome
- Application for adoption dismissed. No order as to costs. Exhibits to be dealt with under Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW).
- Legal Topics
- Adoption by Relatives, Best Interests of the Child, Consent to Adoption, Sole Consent by Child, Dispense With Consent, Immigration and Adoption, Jurisdiction to Make Adoption Order, Adoption Versus Other Legal Alternatives
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms SS
First Plaintiff
Mr PGH
Second Plaintiff
Child WS (via Separate Representative)
Child
Secretary, Department of Family & Community Services
First Defendant
Procedural Posture
Adoption Application by Relatives / Final Judgment – Application for Making Adoption Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether adoption order is in best interests of child both in childhood and later life
- 2 Whether adoption order is clearly preferable to any other action that could be taken by law
- 3 Whether sole consent of child (aged 12+) is sufficient and birth parent consent is required or can be dispensed with
Ratio Decidendi
The application for adoption is dismissed because the Court is not satisfied, on the evidence, that making an adoption order is in the best interests of the child or is clearly preferable to other available legal actions. There is insufficient evidence that the adoption will secure the stability, security, or benefits claimed, particularly as the proceedings’ main purpose is to secure an immigration visa, and there is no evidence that the order will assure the child’s return or right to remain in Australia. The statutory requirements for best interests and clear preferability were not met.
Court Disposition
Application for adoption dismissed. No order as to costs. Exhibits to be dealt with under Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW).
Orders
- Amended Summons dismissed
- No order as to the costs of any party – each party to pay their own costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment