Re Shoreline Currencies (Australia) Pty Ltd v. Ex parte Morrison, P. & Anor [1987] FCA 205
Because adequate notice requiring Mr Morrison for cross-examination had been given, he was not produced, and the material did not show a sufficient reason why he could not attend or why special leave should be given, the affidavit could not be used under rule 135 of the Bankruptcy Rules.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 March 1987
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Proceeding / Interlocutory Evidentiary Ruling on Whether an Affidavit Could Be Read Where the Deponent Was Required for Cross Examination
- Outcome
- The affidavit of Phillip Morrison was not received.
- Legal Topics
- ['affidavit Evidence' 'cross Examination of Deponent' 'special Leave to Use Affidavit' 'bankruptcy Rules']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Proceeding / Interlocutory Evidentiary Ruling on Whether an Affidavit Could Be Read Where the Deponent Was Required for Cross Examination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the affidavit of Phillip Morrison could be used as evidence when notice requiring his attendance for cross-examination had been given under rule 135 of the Bankruptcy Rules and he was not produced.' 'Whether special leave should be given to use the affidavit despite the deponent not being produced for cross-examination.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because adequate notice requiring Mr Morrison for cross-examination had been given, he was not produced, and the material did not show a sufficient reason why he could not attend or why special leave should be given, the affidavit could not be used under rule 135 of the Bankruptcy Rules.
Court Disposition
The affidavit of Phillip Morrison was not received.
Orders
- ['The Court will not receive the affidavit.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment