R v Abdulhadi [2012] NSWSC 1658
Given the high objective gravity of the offence, the very significant need for general deterrence, and the guidance of current sentencing ranges, but accounting for the offender's medical and psychological issues as special circumstances, a sentence of 3 years and 7 months (after 10% reduction for late guilty plea), with a non-parole period of 2 years, is appropriate.
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Offender: Rami Abdulhadi
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 April 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Sentenced to 3 years and 7 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 2 years.
- Legal Topics
- Affray, Sentencing, General Deterrence, Guilty Plea Discount, Special Circumstances, Objective Gravity, Remorse, Criminal History
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
Rami Abdulhadi
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for count of affray contrary to s 93C Crimes Act 1900
- 2 Extent of discount for guilty plea entered at late stage
- 3 Relevance of general deterrence in sentencing for public violence
Ratio Decidendi
Given the high objective gravity of the offence, the very significant need for general deterrence, and the guidance of current sentencing ranges, but accounting for the offender's medical and psychological issues as special circumstances, a sentence of 3 years and 7 months (after 10% reduction for late guilty plea), with a non-parole period of 2 years, is appropriate.
Court Disposition
Sentenced to 3 years and 7 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 2 years.
Orders
- Offender sentenced to 3 years and 7 months commencing 25 October 2010, expiring 24 May 2014.
- Non-parole period of 2 years expiring 24 October 2012.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment