R v Marshall [2020] NSWDC 463
The sentence reflects the seriousness of the aggravated robbery, the ongoing pattern of offending, Marshall's background and institutionalisation, the breach of parole, and the utilitarian benefit of an early guilty plea with special circumstances considered. Individualised treatment and supervised release are intended to assist rehabilitation and protect the community.
- Parties
- Offender: Michael Ian Marshall; Prosecutor: Director of Public Prosecutions
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 June 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Convicted and sentenced to imprisonment
- Legal Topics
- Aggravated Robbery, Sentencing, Use of Corporal Violence, Parole, Drug Rehabilitation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Ian Marshall
Offender
Director of Public Prosecutions
Prosecutor
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentencing for aggravated robbery involving corporal violence
- 2 Impact of offender's history and institutionalisation on sentence
- 3 Consideration of drug rehabilitation and special circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence reflects the seriousness of the aggravated robbery, the ongoing pattern of offending, Marshall's background and institutionalisation, the breach of parole, and the utilitarian benefit of an early guilty plea with special circumstances considered. Individualised treatment and supervised release are intended to assist rehabilitation and protect the community.
Court Disposition
Convicted and sentenced to imprisonment
Orders
- Marshall is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 3 years 2 months.
- Non-parole period of 1 year 8 months commencing 24 August 2019 and expiring 23 April 2021.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment