R v Brady [2020] NSWDC 865
The Court found that the aggravated break and enter offence fell below the mid-range of objective seriousness, justifying departure from the standard non-parole period, but that the offender's prior similar record, commission of the offence in the complainant's home, and offending while on conditional liberty made full-time imprisonment necessary. The offender's early guilty plea, remorse, spontaneous offending, reasonable rehabilitation prospects, low risk of reoffending, COVID-related custody hardship, and need for alcohol-related rehabilitation supported a 25% discount and special circumstances, resulting in an aggregate sentence of 3 years' imprisonment with an 18-month non-parole...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence / Sentence Following Guilty Pleas; Form 1 Offences and a Related Offence on a Section 166 Certificate Considered
- Outcome
- Offender convicted and sentenced to an aggregate full-time custodial sentence; final apprehended domestic violence order made.
- Legal Topics
- ['aggravated Break and Enter' 'stalk or Intimidate Intending Fear of Physical Harm' 'contravention of Apprehended Violence Order' 'standard Non Parole Period' 'form 1 Offences' 'special Circumstances' 'full Time Custody' 'apprehended Domestic Violence Order']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence / Sentence Following Guilty Pleas; Form 1 Offences and a Related Offence on a Section 166 Certificate Considered
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What sentence should be imposed for stalk/intimidate intending fear of physical harm in a domestic violence context, aggravated break and enter and commit a serious indictable offence, and contravention of an AVO.' 'Whether the objective seriousness of the aggravated break and enter offence warranted application of the standard non-parole period.' 'Whether no sentence other than imprisonment was appropriate under section 5 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW).' 'Whether special circumstances justified an extended parole period.' 'Whether a final apprehended domestic violence order should be made.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the aggravated break and enter offence fell below the mid-range of objective seriousness, justifying departure from the standard non-parole period, but that the offender's prior similar record, commission of the offence in the complainant's home, and offending while on conditional liberty made full-time imprisonment necessary. The offender's early guilty plea, remorse, spontaneous offending, reasonable rehabilitation prospects, low risk of reoffending, COVID-related custody hardship, and need for alcohol-related rehabilitation supported a 25% discount and special circumstances, resulting in an aggregate sentence of 3 years' imprisonment with an 18-month non-parole...
Court Disposition
Offender convicted and sentenced to an aggregate full-time custodial sentence; final apprehended domestic violence order made.
Orders
- ['The Offender was convicted of stalk/intimidate intending fear of physical harm in a domestic context contrary to section 13(1) of the Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007.' 'The Offender was convicted of aggravated break and enter and commit a serious indictable offence, with the aggravation that he...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment