Regina v Bradley Reginald White [2008] NSWDC 203
The offence was serious because the offender forced entry into a victim's home, attacked a fifty-nine year old woman with a piece of wood, wrapped a phone cord around her neck, damaged her telephone and was on a bond at the time. However, the injuries were significant but not substantial, the offending was short, not premeditated, and the intention to force entry was formed shortly before entry. The offending was therefore below the middle of the range of objective seriousness, but the offender's record, commission while on conditional liberty, limited evidence of contrition and only fair prospects of rehabilitation required a custodial sentence of four years with a three-year non-parole...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 February 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Law Sentence for Aggravated Break and Enter and Commit Serious Indictable Offence / Sentencing After Guilty Plea
- Outcome
- Sentenced to four years imprisonment with a non-parole period of three years.
- Legal Topics
- ['aggravated Break and Enter and Commit Serious Indictable Offence' 'assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm' 'standard Non Parole Period' 'objective Seriousness' 'conditional Liberty' 'criminal Record']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Law Sentence for Aggravated Break and Enter and Commit Serious Indictable Offence / Sentencing After Guilty Plea
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What sentence should be imposed for aggravated break and enter and commit a serious indictable offence under s 112(2) of the Crimes Act 1900.' 'Where the offending fell in the range of objective seriousness for offences of this type.' 'What aggravating and mitigating factors, including criminal record, conditional liberty, guilty plea, prospects of rehabilitation and contrition, should affect sentence.']
Ratio Decidendi
The offence was serious because the offender forced entry into a victim's home, attacked a fifty-nine year old woman with a piece of wood, wrapped a phone cord around her neck, damaged her telephone and was on a bond at the time. However, the injuries were significant but not substantial, the offending was short, not premeditated, and the intention to force entry was formed shortly before entry. The offending was therefore below the middle of the range of objective seriousness, but the offender's record, commission while on conditional liberty, limited evidence of contrition and only fair prospects of rehabilitation required a custodial sentence of four years with a three-year non-parole...
Court Disposition
Sentenced to four years imprisonment with a non-parole period of three years.
Orders
- ['For the offence of aggravated break and enter and commit serious indictable offence, the offender is sentenced to imprisonment for four years.' 'A non-parole period of three years is set, commencing on 11 July 2007 and expiring on 10 July 2010.' 'The balance of the term is one year from 11 July 2010 to 10 July...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment