R v Pead, R v Pead [2014] NSWDC 103
Thomas Pead's offending was objectively too serious for a s 9 bond because he forced entry into closed premises and damaged property inside, and the offence ordinarily warranted imprisonment, but given the available sentence length and his circumstances an alternative to full-time custody should be considered by referral for intensive corrections order assessment. Scott Pead's youth, early plea, anxiety and alcohol problems, lesser role and need to demonstrate rehabilitation justified adjourning his sentencing under s 11 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act with bail conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 April 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence / Sentencing Remarks; Thomas Pead Referred for Assessment for an Intensive Corrections Order and Scott Pead Adjourned Under S 11 of the Crimes (sentencing Procedure) Act
- Outcome
- Thomas Pead was referred for assessment as to his suitability to serve a sentence of imprisonment by means of an intensive corrections order. Scott Pead's matter was adjourned under s 11 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act.
- Legal Topics
- ['aggravated Break, Enter and Commit Serious Indictable Offence' 'aggravated Break and Enter With Intent to Commit Serious Indictable Offence' 'in Company' 'intentionally Damaging Property' 'stealing' 'self Induced Intoxication' 'parity' 'intensive Corrections Order' 'section 11 Adjournment' 'guilty Plea Discount']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence / Sentencing Remarks; Thomas Pead Referred for Assessment for an Intensive Corrections Order and Scott Pead Adjourned Under S 11 of the Crimes (sentencing Procedure) Act
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What sentence should be imposed on Thomas Pead for aggravated break and enter and commit serious indictable offence in company where the serious indictable offence was intentionally damaging property.' 'Whether Thomas Pead should receive a s 9 bond, full-time custody, or an alternative to full-time custody including assessment for an intensive corrections order.' 'What sentencing course should be adopted for Scott Pead for aggravated break and enter with intent to commit stealing in company.' 'Whether Scott Pead should be adjourned under s 11 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act to demonstrate rehabilitation.' 'How self-induced intoxication, rehabilitation prospects, parity, youth, criminal history, and guilty pleas should affect sentence.']
Ratio Decidendi
Thomas Pead's offending was objectively too serious for a s 9 bond because he forced entry into closed premises and damaged property inside, and the offence ordinarily warranted imprisonment, but given the available sentence length and his circumstances an alternative to full-time custody should be considered by referral for intensive corrections order assessment. Scott Pead's youth, early plea, anxiety and alcohol problems, lesser role and need to demonstrate rehabilitation justified adjourning his sentencing under s 11 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act with bail conditions.
Court Disposition
Thomas Pead was referred for assessment as to his suitability to serve a sentence of imprisonment by means of an intensive corrections order. Scott Pead's matter was adjourned under s 11 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act.
Orders
- ['Thomas Pead is referred for assessment as to his suitability to serve that sentence of imprisonment by means of an intensive corrections order.' 'The matter of Scott Pead is adjourned under s 11 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act.' 'The matter of Scott Pead is listed for 18 December at 10am.' 'Scott Pead is...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment