R v Holman [2019] NSWDC 292
The offending, especially the assaults occasioning actual bodily harm, was serious and required significant general deterrence and full-time custody; however, the offender's accepted remorse, utilitarian discount, seizure condition, need for treatment for drug abuse, and reasonable prospects of rehabilitation justified special circumstances and a lenient aggregate non-parole period. Parity did not reduce the sentence because Holman's role and charges were significantly more serious than the co-offender's.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 May 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentencing / Committed for Sentence From Forster Local Court
- Outcome
- Aggregate sentence of three years imprisonment with an aggregate non-parole period of 13 months imposed; offender eligible for parole on 1 November 2019.
- Legal Topics
- ['aggravated Break, Enter and Commit Serious Indictable Offence' 'assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm' 'form 1 Offence' 'drive Whilst Disqualified' 'remorse' 'drug Addiction' 'health Issues' 'special Circumstances' 'aggregate Sentence' 'intensive Correction Order']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing / Committed for Sentence From Forster Local Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What aggregate sentence should be imposed for aggravated break, enter and commit serious indictable offence, assault occasioning actual bodily harm, and related driving offending.' 'What weight should be given to the Form 1 assault occasioning actual bodily harm offence.' "Whether the offender's remorse, health issues, drug addiction, background and prospects of rehabilitation warranted mitigation or special circumstances." 'Whether parity with co-offender Brown affected sentence.' 'Whether an intensive correction order or full-time custody was appropriate.']
Ratio Decidendi
The offending, especially the assaults occasioning actual bodily harm, was serious and required significant general deterrence and full-time custody; however, the offender's accepted remorse, utilitarian discount, seizure condition, need for treatment for drug abuse, and reasonable prospects of rehabilitation justified special circumstances and a lenient aggregate non-parole period. Parity did not reduce the sentence because Holman's role and charges were significantly more serious than the co-offender's.
Court Disposition
Aggregate sentence of three years imprisonment with an aggregate non-parole period of 13 months imposed; offender eligible for parole on 1 November 2019.
Orders
- ['Indicative sentence for sequence 2 on the s 166 certificate: four months, reduced by 25 percent to three months.' 'Indicative sentence for sequence 4, attaching sequence 1 on the Form: three years six months, reduced by 25 percent to two years seven months, with an indicated non-parole period of 11 months.'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment