R v ROBERTS [2005] NSWCCA 401
The sentencing judge made no error of the kind described in House v The King, and the sentence of 4 years with a non-parole period of 2½ years was not manifestly excessive. The sentence was within the available range, appropriate given the appellant's prior offending and absence of contrition, and consistent with parity because Mr Patterson's lower sentence reflected a guilty plea discount.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentencing Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['aggravated Break, Enter and Steal' 'manifestly Excessive Sentence' 'parity' 'sentencing Discretion']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave to appeal against sentence should be granted.' 'Whether the sentence imposed for aggravated break, enter and steal contrary to s.112(2) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) was manifestly excessive.' 'Whether the sentence was consistent with parity principles by reference to the sentence imposed on Mr Patterson.']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge made no error of the kind described in House v The King, and the sentence of 4 years with a non-parole period of 2½ years was not manifestly excessive. The sentence was within the available range, appropriate given the appellant's prior offending and absence of contrition, and consistent with parity because Mr Patterson's lower sentence reflected a guilty plea discount.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal be granted and the appeal be dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment