R v Adrian MURRAY [2009] NSWDC 407
Although the offence was within the lower range of objective seriousness because it was unsophisticated, involved no significant advance planning and no property was stolen, imprisonment was the only appropriate penalty because the offence carried a 14 year maximum, was committed in company, the offender had prior convictions for similar property offences, and he committed it while serving a suspended sentence. The otherwise appropriate sentence was reduced to 21 months to reflect mental health considerations, improved rehabilitation prospects and a guilty plea, and was wholly suspended under s 12 on conditions because of the offender's rehabilitation prospects and supportive family...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentencing for Aggravated Breaking and Entering With Intent to Commit a Serious Indictable Offence / Sentence After Plea of Guilty
- Outcome
- The offender was convicted and sentenced to 21 months imprisonment, wholly suspended pursuant to s 12 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, on condition that he enter into a good behaviour bond for 21 months.
- Legal Topics
- ['aggravated Break, Enter and Steal in Company' 'guilty Plea Discount' 'prior Criminal Record' 'offence Committed While Serving Suspended Sentence' 'specific Deterrence' 'mental Health and Rehabilitation' 'suspended Sentence' 'good Behaviour Bond']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing for Aggravated Breaking and Entering With Intent to Commit a Serious Indictable Offence / Sentence After Plea of Guilty
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What sentence should be imposed for aggravated breaking and entering with intent to steal under s 113(2) of the Crimes Act 1900.' 'How to assess objective seriousness where the offence was unsophisticated, involved limited planning and no actual theft, but was committed in company.' "What weight should be given to the offender's prior property offending and the fact that the offence was committed while serving a suspended sentence." "What weight should be given to the offender's mental health, restrictive bail conditions, pre-sentence custody, family support, rehabilitation prospects and plea of guilty."]
Ratio Decidendi
Although the offence was within the lower range of objective seriousness because it was unsophisticated, involved no significant advance planning and no property was stolen, imprisonment was the only appropriate penalty because the offence carried a 14 year maximum, was committed in company, the offender had prior convictions for similar property offences, and he committed it while serving a suspended sentence. The otherwise appropriate sentence was reduced to 21 months to reflect mental health considerations, improved rehabilitation prospects and a guilty plea, and was wholly suspended under s 12 on conditions because of the offender's rehabilitation prospects and supportive family...
Court Disposition
The offender was convicted and sentenced to 21 months imprisonment, wholly suspended pursuant to s 12 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, on condition that he enter into a good behaviour bond for 21 months.
Orders
- ['Adrian Murray is convicted of aggravated breaking and entering with intent to commit a serious indictable offence.' 'Adrian Murray is sentenced to 21 months imprisonment.' 'Under s 12 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act, execution of the whole sentence is suspended for the whole period of 21 months.' 'Adrian...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment