R v Miller [2019] NSWDC 910
The offending was objectively at the lower end for this type of offence because it was unplanned, impulsive, short-lived, involved some minor provocation, and the circumstance of aggravation and Form 1 matter did not substantially increase seriousness. The offender was entitled to a 25% discount for the early plea and had demonstrated remorse and prospects of rehabilitation, but his criminal history did not entitle him to leniency and deterrence, denunciation and punishment remained necessary. Special circumstances were found because of his rehabilitation prospects, drug-related difficulties and need for supervision and assistance on release, resulting in an 18 month term with a 9 month...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence / Sentencing After Plea of Guilty in the Local Court and Committal for Sentence to the District Court
- Outcome
- Convicted and sentenced to 18 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 9 months.
- Legal Topics
- ['aggravated Enter Dwelling With Intent Knowing People There' 'form 1 Offence' 'early Plea of Guilty' 'dysfunctional Upbringing' 'drug Use' 'adhd' 'prospects of Rehabilitation' 'special Circumstances' 'non Parole Period']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence / Sentencing After Plea of Guilty in the Local Court and Committal for Sentence to the District Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What sentence should be imposed for an offence contrary to s 111(2) Crimes Act 1900, taking into account a Form 1 offence contrary to s 195(1)(a) Crimes Act 1900.' 'Whether the offender should receive a 25% discount for an early plea of guilty.' "How the offender's background of disadvantage, drug use, ADHD, impulsivity, remorse, criminal history and prospects of rehabilitation should affect sentence." 'Whether special circumstances should be found for the purposes of fixing the non-parole period.']
Ratio Decidendi
The offending was objectively at the lower end for this type of offence because it was unplanned, impulsive, short-lived, involved some minor provocation, and the circumstance of aggravation and Form 1 matter did not substantially increase seriousness. The offender was entitled to a 25% discount for the early plea and had demonstrated remorse and prospects of rehabilitation, but his criminal history did not entitle him to leniency and deterrence, denunciation and punishment remained necessary. Special circumstances were found because of his rehabilitation prospects, drug-related difficulties and need for supervision and assistance on release, resulting in an 18 month term with a 9 month...
Court Disposition
Convicted and sentenced to 18 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 9 months.
Orders
- ['The offender is convicted.' 'The offender is sentenced to a term of imprisonment with a non-parole period of 9 months commencing on 14 March 2019 and expiring on 13 December 2019.' 'The balance of sentence is 9 months, expiring on 13 September 2020.' 'The Form 1 matter was taken into account.' 'A finding of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment