R v Carleton [2019] NSWDC 862
Given the number and seriousness of the child sexual offences, the offender's exploitation of a vulnerable child, the need for deterrence, punishment, denunciation and recognition of harm, and after allowing for subjective matters, rehabilitation prospects and special circumstances, the only appropriate penalty was full-time imprisonment by way of an aggregate sentence of nine years with a non-parole period of five years and five months.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentencing / Sentence After Jury Trial Verdicts of Guilty
- Outcome
- Aggregate sentence of imprisonment of nine years with a non-parole period of five years five months.
- Legal Topics
- ['aggravated Indecent Assault of a Person Aged Under 16 Years' 'sexual Intercourse With a Person Under the Age of 14 Years But Above the Age of Ten' 'sexual Intercourse With a Person Under the Age of 16 Years But Above 14 Years of Age' 'objective Seriousness' 'aggravating and Mitigating Circumstances' 'aggregate Sentence' 'special Circumstances' 'non Parole Period']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing / Sentence After Jury Trial Verdicts of Guilty
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What sentence should be imposed for three counts of aggravated indecent assault of a person aged under 16 years, five counts of sexual intercourse with a person under the age of 14 years but above the age of ten, and one count of sexual intercourse with a person under the age of 16 years but above 14 years of age.' 'How the objective seriousness of each offence should be assessed, including whether there was breach of trust, victim vulnerability, commission in a home, violence, alcohol use, remorse, rehabilitation prospects and extra-curial punishment.' 'Whether an aggregate sentence and special circumstances should be found.']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the number and seriousness of the child sexual offences, the offender's exploitation of a vulnerable child, the need for deterrence, punishment, denunciation and recognition of harm, and after allowing for subjective matters, rehabilitation prospects and special circumstances, the only appropriate penalty was full-time imprisonment by way of an aggregate sentence of nine years with a non-parole period of five years and five months.
Court Disposition
Aggregate sentence of imprisonment of nine years with a non-parole period of five years five months.
Orders
- ['The offender is sentenced to an aggregate head sentence of nine years imprisonment with a non-parole period of five years five months, each dating from 29 November 2019.' 'The head sentence will expire on 28 November 2028.' 'The non-parole period will expire on 28 April 2025.' 'Non-publication of complainant.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment