R v Kuol [2019] NSWDC 181
The offence warranted a custodial sentence with the term reduced by 25% due to an early guilty plea, and special circumstances justified a longer parole period relative to the head sentence; the offending was between the middle and bottom of objective seriousness for aggravated robbery involving corporal violence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 27 months with a non-parole period of 12 months; finding of special circumstances; sentence backdated to 21 June 2018.
- Legal Topics
- ['aggravated Robbery' 'special Circumstances' 'sentencing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Determination of appropriate sentence for aggravated robbery under s 95 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)' 'Assessment of objective seriousness of offending' 'Consideration of special circumstances in sentencing' 'Relevancy of offender’s background, remorse, prospects of rehabilitation']
Ratio Decidendi
The offence warranted a custodial sentence with the term reduced by 25% due to an early guilty plea, and special circumstances justified a longer parole period relative to the head sentence; the offending was between the middle and bottom of objective seriousness for aggravated robbery involving corporal violence.
Court Disposition
Sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 27 months with a non-parole period of 12 months; finding of special circumstances; sentence backdated to 21 June 2018.
Orders
- ['Offender to be sentenced to 27 months imprisonment' 'Non-parole period set at 12 months' 'Offender eligible for parole on 20 June 2019' 'Sentence backdated to 21 June 2018']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment