R v Sullivan [2022] NSWDC 404

R v Sullivan [2022] NSWDC 404

The offending was serious domestic violence culminating in choking and aggravated sexual assault, with repeated intimidation, assaults, intimate-image offences and breach of an apprehended violence order. The offender's severe disadvantage, trauma, mental health and substance use reduced moral culpability and moderated deterrence, but his violent history, limited insight and risk to intimate partners required punishment, denunciation and protection of the community. Applying a 5% guilty-plea discount, taking the Form 1 matters into account for count 2, and applying totality, proportionality and special circumstances, a substantially concurrent aggregate sentence was required rather than...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 September 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing / Reasons on Sentence After Guilty Pleas
Outcome
The offender was convicted and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment with a non-parole period of eight and a half years and a balance of term of four and a half years.
Legal Topics
['aggravated Sexual Assault' 'choking With Intent to Commit Another Indictable Offence' 'distribution and Recording of Intimate Images Without Consent' 'assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm' 'common Assault' 'intimidation' 'contravention of Apprehended Domestic Violence Order' 'form 1 Offences' 'aggregate Sentence' 'totality' 'special Circumstances' 'domestic Violence']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentencing / Reasons on Sentence After Guilty Pleas

  1. 1 ['What sentences should be imposed for the 3 counts on the indictment, the 7 matters dealt with summarily on the section 166 certificate, and the 4 Form 1 matters taken into account on count 2.' 'How the objective seriousness of each offence should be assessed having regard to the facts, maximum penalties and, for the s 61J offence, the standard non-parole period.' 'How the Form 1 matters should affect sentence for the principal aggravated sexual assault offence.' 'Whether and to what extent the sentences should be concurrent or cumulative under the principles of totality and proportionality, including the jurisdictional limit for summary matters.' "What weight should be given to the offender's disadvantaged background, mental health, substance use, criminal history, guilty plea, remorse, risk of reoffending, need for rehabilitation, and special circumstances."]

Ratio Decidendi

The offending was serious domestic violence culminating in choking and aggravated sexual assault, with repeated intimidation, assaults, intimate-image offences and breach of an apprehended violence order. The offender's severe disadvantage, trauma, mental health and substance use reduced moral culpability and moderated deterrence, but his violent history, limited insight and risk to intimate partners required punishment, denunciation and protection of the community. Applying a 5% guilty-plea discount, taking the Form 1 matters into account for count 2, and applying totality, proportionality and special circumstances, a substantially concurrent aggregate sentence was required rather than...

Court Disposition

The offender was convicted and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment with a non-parole period of eight and a half years and a balance of term of four and a half years.

Orders

  • ['The offender is convicted of the 3 counts on the indictment and the 7 matters set out on the section 166 certificate.' 'The offender is sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment to date from 16 September 2020 with a non-parole period of eight and a half years expiring on 15 March 2029 and with a balance of...