R v Hampden (a pseudonym) [2021] NSWDC 195
The offending involved repeated sexual abuse of two child victims, including the offender's daughter and niece, in their home and in abuse of a position of trust. The principal offences were assessed as at or around the mid-range for offences of their kind, the Form 1 matters meaningfully increased the sentence for sequence 5, the victims suffered serious trauma, the offender had no meaningful insight, his remorse was not accepted as genuine, his prospects of rehabilitation were poor, and general and specific deterrence required full-time imprisonment. After applying a 25 per cent discount for early guilty pleas and taking totality into account, an aggregate sentence of 12 years...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence / Sentence After Early Pleas of Guilty
- Outcome
- Aggregate term of imprisonment of 12 years with a non-parole period of 9 years.
- Legal Topics
- ['aggravated Sexual Assault With a Victim Under 16 Years' 'intentionally Sexually Touching a Child' 'inciting the Commission of Aggravated Sexual Assault With a Victim Under 16 Years of Age' 'form 1 Matters' 'victim Impact Statements' 'general Deterrence' 'specific Deterrence' 'aggregate Sentence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence / Sentence After Early Pleas of Guilty
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What aggregate sentence should be imposed for nine principal sexual offences involving two child victims.' 'How the four Form 1 matters attached to sequence 5 should affect the sentence for that principal offence.' "Whether the psychologist's opinion about risk to children should be accepted." 'Whether special circumstances should be found to vary the ratio of the head sentence to the non-parole period.']
Ratio Decidendi
The offending involved repeated sexual abuse of two child victims, including the offender's daughter and niece, in their home and in abuse of a position of trust. The principal offences were assessed as at or around the mid-range for offences of their kind, the Form 1 matters meaningfully increased the sentence for sequence 5, the victims suffered serious trauma, the offender had no meaningful insight, his remorse was not accepted as genuine, his prospects of rehabilitation were poor, and general and specific deterrence required full-time imprisonment. After applying a 25 per cent discount for early guilty pleas and taking totality into account, an aggregate sentence of 12 years...
Court Disposition
Aggregate term of imprisonment of 12 years with a non-parole period of 9 years.
Orders
- ['For the nine principal offences, taking into account the Form 1 matters in relation to sequence 5, the offender is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 12 years.' 'A non-parole period of 9 years is fixed to date from 22 May 2020 and to expire on 21 May 2029.' 'A balance of 3 years is fixed to date from 22 May...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment